Zanu PF Official Blasts Chinese Investors
24 January 2025
Spread the love

By A Correspondent

In a controversial outburst that has already stirred tensions within Zanu PF, prominent party official Killer Zivhu has sharply criticized Chinese investors operating in Zimbabwe, accusing them of exploiting local communities and recolonizing the nation. His remarks are raising eyebrows, especially as they come from a heavyweight within the ruling party.

Zivhu, known for his outspoken views, took to social media platform X on Thursday, where he expressed his concerns about the growing influence of Chinese businesses in the country. He described the influx of Chinese investment as the “beginning of catastrophic consequences” for Zimbabwe.

“Chinese investment influx: just the beginning of catastrophic consequences?” Zivhu wrote, warning that the exploitation of locals by these foreign investors would only intensify. “Mati madini zvenyu kana zviri zvokurohwa mucham*ma chaiko, takatengwa kare tava vanhu vavo, chero mukapopota hapana chinouya, Smith wadzoka ne vanhu vake,” he added in a shorter version of his original post.

The harsh words reflect Zivhu’s growing frustration with the role Chinese companies play in Zimbabwe’s economic landscape. He hinted at the deepening dependency on China, likening the situation to a form of “recolonization.” His comments also suggest that despite widespread discontent, local opposition to the influence of Chinese investors has been largely ineffective.

Zivhu’s remarks are likely to unsettle top figures in Zanu PF, especially as the party has been strengthening its ties with China, which is a major investor in various sectors, including mining, infrastructure, and manufacturing. These investments are critical to Zimbabwe’s economic recovery, but they have also raised concerns over environmental degradation, labor rights violations, and the erosion of local businesses.

The Zanu PF heavyweight’s statement adds to a growing chorus of criticism regarding Chinese operations in Zimbabwe, though it remains unclear how his comments will be received within the party’s inner circles. As Zivhu’s influence continues to shape political discourse, his stance could signal broader unrest among party members who may feel uneasy about the country’s increasing dependence on China.

This bold critique is already drawing attention, and it remains to be seen whether it will spark a wider debate about foreign investment and Zimbabwe’s sovereignty, or whether it will be dismissed as a lone voice within the party.