By A Correspondent
In a controversial outburst that is likely to stir tensions within Zanu PF, prominent party official Killer Zivhu has sharply criticized Chinese investors operating in Zimbabwe, accusing them of exploiting local communities and recolonizing the nation. His remarks, coming from a senior figure within the ruling party, are already drawing significant attention.
Known for his outspoken views, Zivhu took to social media platform X on Thursday to voice his concerns about the growing influence of Chinese businesses in Zimbabwe. He described the influx of Chinese investment as the “beginning of catastrophic consequences” for the country.
“Chinese investment influx: just the beginning of catastrophic consequences?” Zivhu wrote, warning that the exploitation of locals by foreign investors would only escalate. “Mati madini zvenyu kana zviri zvokurohwa mucham*ma chaiko, takatengwa kare tava vanhu vavo, chero mukapopota hapana chinouya, Smith wadzoka ne vanhu vake,” he added, in a shorter version of his original post.
Zivhu’s remarks reflect a growing frustration with the role Chinese companies play in Zimbabwe’s economy. He suggested that the country’s increasing dependency on China could be seen as a form of “recolonization.” His comments also highlight the inefficacy of local opposition to Chinese influence, despite widespread discontent among Zimbabweans.
These statements are likely to unsettle high-ranking members of Zanu PF, especially as the party has been strengthening its ties with China, a major investor in sectors such as mining, infrastructure, and manufacturing. While these investments are crucial for Zimbabwe’s economic recovery, they have also raised concerns over environmental damage, labor exploitation, and the decline of local businesses.
Zivhu’s bold critique adds to the growing criticism of Chinese operations in Zimbabwe. However, it remains to be seen how his comments will be received within the party’s leadership. As his influence continues to shape political discourse, his stance could signal deeper unrest among party members who are uneasy about Zimbabwe’s increasing reliance on China.
This provocative statement has already sparked significant debate and could either ignite a broader discussion about foreign investment and Zimbabwe’s sovereignty, or be dismissed as the voice of one disgruntled party official.