Mnangagwa Bribes Mujuru With House, Borehole Project
25 March 2025
Spread the love

By A Correspondent

In a move that has raised eyebrows, President Emmerson Mnangagwa on Monday presented a house to war veteran Cde Mujuru as part of a broader initiative aimed at securing the loyalty of former freedom fighters. The house was handed over during a ceremony at Murehwa Centre, marking the latest attempt by the Zanu PF leader to maintain the support of this influential group.

According to a statement from Zanu PF, the house was given to Mujuru under the Presidential War Veterans Fund, borehole drilling, and Rural Housing Scheme.

The handover was facilitated by ZANU PF Secretary for War Veterans Affairs, Douglas Mahiya, and Special Presidential Advisor Paul Tungwarara.

The ceremony was also attended by the Mashonaland East provincial leadership, headed by Chairman Daniel Garwe.

“Today (Monday), ZANU PF Secretary for War Veterans Affairs Douglas Mahiya and Special Presidential Advisor Paul Tungwarara handed over a house at Murehwa center to Mash East based War Veteran Cde Mujuru under the Presidential War Veterans Fund, borehole drilling, and Rural Housing Scheme,” read the statement from the ruling party.

The presentation of the house, along with the associated rural development projects, is widely seen as part of Mnangagwa’s strategy to appease and retain the support of war veterans who have played a critical role in the country’s political history. The addition of a borehole project, which addresses water shortages in rural areas, further demonstrates the government’s attempt to make tangible improvements in the lives of those who fought for Zimbabwe’s independence.

This gesture comes at a time when Mnangagwa’s government has been facing increasing pressure from both within and outside the Zanu PF party. Many political analysts view these kinds of moves as attempts to secure the loyalty of key figures, especially from the war veterans’ community, who have often played a significant role in influencing political outcomes in Zimbabwe.

However, critics have argued that these actions, which some consider bribes, highlight a broader pattern of patronage politics, where support is bought rather than earned through genuine development or policy changes. “It seems that the government is using material gifts to secure loyalty instead of addressing the underlying issues affecting war veterans and the wider population,” said one political analyst, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

As the government continues to distribute resources under the guise of development programs, the motivations behind such acts are likely to remain a subject of intense debate in Zimbabwean political circles.