By Hector Madzima | It is rather strange that Hopewell Chin’ono, who once championed the idea of a government-in-exile—an idea that flopped as no one supported it—is now silent on the upcoming 31 March demonstration. Despite having consistently been at the forefront of attacking the Mnangagwa government, Hopewell has chosen to “blue tick” this demo, raising eyebrows.

This silence has cast doubts on Hopewell’s integrity and his true commitment to genuine reforms in Zimbabwe.

What does Hopewell really stand for? Does he truly stand with the people, or is he driven by personal interests?

We all know that Hopewell allegedly put in some media and PR work in support of the November 2017 events, reportedly eyeing a top position at ZBC or Zimpapers. When that did not materialize, he turned into a vocal critic of the Second Republic.

Sources close to Hopewell claim he has distanced himself from the 31 March protest, calling it a “treasonous attempt” to remove Mnangagwa from power. They say Hopewell has predicted the march will flop and that participants and endorsers could face treason charges.

These sources also allege that Hopewell boasted that the demonstration will fail and that those leading it will face serious consequences. He is said to have used Blessed Mhlanga as an example, warning that when things go wrong, individuals are left to face the full force of the law without any support—and that he wants no part of the 31 March action.

Some suggest that Hopewell only endorses initiatives where he sees personal benefit or financial gain. Could this be true? Is this the Hopewell Chin’ono behind the social media persona?

If these claims are true, they expose Hopewell as a self-serving journalist who leverages his platform and influence for personal interests.

I would like to take this opportunity to challenge Hopewell Chin’ono to publicly state his position regarding the 31 March demonstration. Are you with the people, or are you against them on this one?

Hector Madzima writes in his personal capacity.