By Shelton Muchena| Cde Blessed Geza, a revered war veteran and longtime member of the central committee, was expelled during a tumultuous Mashonaland West gathering chaired by Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi.
However, Cde Geza popularly known as Bombshell’s expulsion has been long anticipated following his attack to the President Mnangagwa and his 2030 cronies.
Known for his passionate speeches and steadfast adherence to the party’s foundational values, Geza ignited controversy with his bold proclamation that “the only 2030 President Mnangagwa will see is half past eight on the clock.”
This provocative statement not only raised eyebrows but also exposed fissures within the party, eliciting mixed reactions from members.
The situation escalated further when Ziyambi Ziyambi, an influential cabinet minister and party stalwart, confirmed that Geza had earlier refused to endorse President Mnangagwa as a ZANU PF candidate in the recent elections.
This act of defiance was seen as a serious breach of party protocol and a direct challenge to presidential authority, fueling perceptions of betrayal against the party’s core tenets.
Ziyambi’s remarks highlighted the intensifying rifts among party leadership, underscoring the shifting dynamics as ZANU PF braces for critical upcoming elections.
Initially intended to bolster party unity, the Mashonaland West conference quickly devolved into chaos following Geza’s audacious statements. His expulsion was not merely a sidelining of one member but rather a clear indication of the broader internal turmoil plaguing ZANU PF—a party facing fierce challenges amid declining public support and a rising tide of opposition.
As the dust settles over Geza’s removal, senior party leaders are increasingly reflective about the implications of their own loyalty. Many war veterans, who once viewed Geza as a steadfast champion of their cause, are now reconsidering their allegiance to a party perceived as straying from its original purpose. The confusion is further amplified as Geza’s supporters rally behind him, igniting a spirit of rebellion against the existing leadership.
This internal conflict transcends individual rivalries; it epitomizes a profound ideological battle within ZANU PF. As the party navigates the turbulent waters leading into the next electoral cycle, the repercussions of Geza’s ousting will likely resonate far beyond the confines of Mashonaland West.
In the wake of this upheaval, observers are left pondering the future of ZANU PF in a nation yearning for meaningful change. Will Blessed Geza rise from the ashes of his expulsion to become a voice for a rejuvenated movement?
Or will the aspirations he championed be sacrificed as the party marches on without him? Only time will reveal the answers to these burning questions as Zimbabwe stands at a political crossroads.
If Geza’s expulsion is primarily a consequence of his insulting remarks directed towards the President, then it stands to reason that a similar standard of accountability should be upheld for others who have made derogatory comments about General Chiwenga.
It is essential to maintain consistency in the enforcement of consequences for disrespectful behavior, regardless of the individual in question. Selective enforcement could lead to perceptions of bias and unfairness within the political landscape, undermining the principles of justice and equality.
If insults and slander are deemed unacceptable in the case of the President, then the same principle should logically extend to General Chiwenga and any other public figures.
Establishing this standard is critical in promoting a culture of respect and civility in political discourse, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their position, are held to the same ethical guidelines.