By Political Reporter — The junta has sidelined President Emmerson Mnangagwa, pressuring him to abandon his ambition to lead the country through his much-touted 2030 Vision. 

The military’s anointment of Mnangagwa’s deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, signals a decisive shift in Zimbabwe’s political landscape and suggests echoes of the 2017 coup that forced former President Robert Mugabe from power.

On Saturday, Mnangagwa announced that he would not seek office beyond 2028, despite endorsements from the party’s ten provincial branches, which had rallied behind his leadership through 2030.

This announcement seems to mark the end of Zanu-PF’s tense succession debate, with Chiwenga and his military allies emerging as the undisputed victors.

Speaking at the close of Zanu-PF’s 21st Annual National People’s Conference in Bulawayo, Mnangagwa framed his decision as a constitutional commitment, emphasising his role in drafting Zimbabwe’s current Constitution.

“I am a constitutionalist,” Mnangagwa stated, presenting his adherence to the law as a matter of principle. Party Secretary for Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, echoed this sentiment, saying, “His Excellency has made it clear that he will abide by the Constitution and has no intention of serving beyond 2028.”

Yet, behind this ostensibly smooth transition lies a fierce power struggle within Zanu-PF, exposing the fractures that have increasingly divided the party. 

Sources close to the matter reveal that Chiwenga issued a stern ultimatum to Mnangagwa, warning him against clinging to power as Mugabe once did.

Insiders suggest Chiwenga reminded Mnangagwa of Mugabe’s fate in 2017, hinting that a similar end could befall him if he resisted the push for succession.

This warning cast a shadow over Mnangagwa’s ambitions and placed him under intense pressure to relinquish his aspirations for extended leadership.

In the days leading up to the conference, Mnangagwa’s supporters, including influential figures like Harare provincial chairperson Godwills Masimirembwa, had mobilised in favour of constitutional amendments that would have allowed him a third term or even indefinite rule. 

This display of loyalty underscored the deep polarisation within Zanu-PF, highlighting factional lines between Mnangagwa loyalists and Chiwenga’s camp. 

Addressing these calls, Mnangagwa advocated for “unity and discipline,” though his appeal was widely interpreted as a thinly veiled response to the factional tensions simmering within the party.

Chiwenga’s allies, growing increasingly frustrated with Mnangagwa’s prolonged ambitions, reportedly revived discussions of countermeasures reminiscent of the 2017 military intervention that toppled Mugabe.

Political analysts have noted that while Mnangagwa’s 2030 Vision garnered symbolic support at the conference, it ultimately deferred rather than resolved the succession question, leaving Zimbabwe’s political future as uncertain as ever.

As Zanu-PF members and political observers analyse the conference’s outcome, rumours of factional scheming continue circulating.

The question remains: will Chiwenga once again leverage his military influence to consolidate his path to leadership? 

For now, it appears that the military’s manoeuvring has once more thrown Zimbabwe’s politics into a state of precarious anticipation, with Chiwenga poised to assume the mantle as Zanu-PF’s next leader by 2028.

By Crime and Courts Reporter-Two people have died, and 43 were injured when an Inter Africa bus veered off the road and overturned at Mguza Bridge on the Gwanda-Bulawayo highway.

The accident occurred near Kensington yesterday as the bus travelled from Mutare to Bulawayo.

Bulawayo Fire Brigade had to rush and rescue three passengers who were trapped in the wreckage.

Although police have yet to release an official statement on the accident, they have consistently urged bus drivers to prioritize passenger safety, emphasizing the need for vigilance and adherence to road regulations to protect human life.

By Political Reporter — President Emmerson Mnangagwa has abandoned his bid for a 2030 vision, succumbing to military pressure in favour of his deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, who is expected to take over in 2028.

In a decisive announcement on Saturday, Mnangagwa confirmed he would not pursue office beyond 2028, despite proposals from the party’s 10 provincial branches advocating for his leadership through 2030.

This declaration signals the conclusion of Zanu PF’s fraught succession debate, with Chiwenga and his military allies emerging as the clear victors.

Mnangagwa’s commitment to adhering to constitutional limits was made during the closing of the 21st Zanu-PF Annual National People’s Conference in Bulawayo.

He underscored his dedication to the Constitution, which he played a key role in drafting, highlighting his decision to step down as a principled choice. 

Presenting the party’s resolutions, Zanu-PF Secretary for Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, relayed Mnangagwa’s stance, stating, “His Excellency had a hand in the drafting of the current Constitution. He is a constitutionalist and has made it clear that he will abide by its provisions, with no intention of serving beyond 2028.”

Behind the scenes, however, the transition reflects a power struggle that has increasingly divided Zanu PF. 

Reports indicate that Chiwenga had issued a stern warning to Mnangagwa, cautioning him against “clinging to power” as former President Robert Mugabe had.

Insiders reveal that Chiwenga’s ultimatum suggested that any attempt to overstay his welcome could result in a similar fate to Mugabe’s forced exit in 2017. 

This internal friction placed intense pressure on Mnangagwa to abandon his bid for an extended presidency.

Just days before Mnangagwa’s announcement, senior party officials and influential provincial leaders like Harare’s Godwills Masimirembwa rallied behind the 2030 agenda, calling for constitutional amendments to allow for a third term or even indefinite rule. 

Their support for Mnangagwa highlighted the polarized views within Zanu PF, sidelining succession conversations and escalating tensions with Chiwenga’s camp. 

In response to these calls, Mnangagwa urged for “unity and discipline” at the conference, though his message appeared to carry an undercurrent of concern over factionalism within the party.

Chiwenga’s supporters, already frustrated by Mnangagwa’s extended ambitions, have reportedly escalated discussions around possible countermeasures, invoking memories of the 2017 military intervention that unseated Mugabe.

Analysts observed that while Mnangagwa’s 2030 vision seemed to gain symbolic support at the conference, it ultimately served to delay rather than resolve succession plans, leaving Zimbabwe’s political landscape on precarious footing.

The conference’s conclusion has amplified factional whispers within Zanu PF, with speculation that Chiwenga may onceagain leverage his military connections to prevent Mnangagwa from extending his rule. 

As party members and analysts assess this latest development, the spotlight remains on whether Chiwenga will use his influence to shape Zimbabwe’s future once more, affirming his position as the party’s next leader in 2028.

By Political Reporter — Zanu PF President Emmerson Mnangagwa has abandoned his bid for a 2030 vision, appearing to succumb to military pressure in favour of his deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, who is expected to take over in 2028.

In a decisive announcement on Saturday, Mnangagwa confirmed he would not pursue office beyond 2028, despite proposals from the party’s 10 provincial branches advocating for his leadership through 2030.

This declaration signals the conclusion of Zanu PF’s fraught succession debate, with Chiwenga and his military allies emerging as the clear victors.

Mnangagwa’s said ‘commitment’ to adhering to constitutional limits was made during the closing of the 21st Zanu-PF Annual National People’s Conference in Bulawayo.

He underscored his dedication to the Constitution, which he played a key role in drafting, highlighting his decision to step down as a principled choice.

Presenting the party’s resolutions, Zanu-PF Secretary for Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, relayed Mnangagwa’s stance, stating, “His Excellency had a hand in the drafting of the current Constitution. He is a constitutionalist and has made it clear that he will abide by its provisions, with no intention of serving beyond 2028.”

Behind the scenes, however, the transition reflects a power struggle that has increasingly divided Zanu PF.

Reports indicate that Chiwenga had issued a stern warning to Mnangagwa, cautioning him against “clinging to power” as former President Robert Mugabe had.

Insiders reveal that Chiwenga’s ultimatum suggested that any attempt to overstay his welcome could result in a similar fate to Mugabe’s forced exit in 2017.

This internal friction placed intense pressure on Mnangagwa to abandon his bid for an extended presidency.

Just days before Mnangagwa’s announcement, senior party officials and influential provincial leaders like Harare’s Godwills Masimirembwa rallied behind the 2030 agenda, calling for constitutional amendments to allow for a third term or even indefinite rule.

Their support for Mnangagwa highlighted the polarized views within Zanu PF, sidelining succession conversations and escalating tensions with Chiwenga’s camp.

In response to these calls, Mnangagwa urged for “unity and discipline” at the conference, though his message appeared to carry an undercurrent of concern over factionalism within the party.

Chiwenga’s supporters, already frustrated by Mnangagwa’s extended ambitions, have reportedly escalated discussions around possible countermeasures, invoking memories of the 2017 military intervention that unseated Mugabe.

Analysts observed that while Mnangagwa’s 2030 vision seemed to gain symbolic support at the conference, it ultimately served to delay rather than resolve succession plans, leaving Zimbabwe’s political landscape on precarious footing.

The conference’s conclusion has amplified factional whispers within Zanu PF, with speculation that Chiwenga may once again leverage his military connections to prevent Mnangagwa from extending his rule.

As party members and analysts assess this latest development, the spotlight remains on whether Chiwenga will use his influence to shape Zimbabwe’s future once more, affirming his position as the party’s next leader in 2028.

By Political Reporter— Vice President Constantino Chiwenga has decisively moved to halt President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s 2030 agenda, shutting down the push for an extended presidency beyond 2028.

This follows intense party pressure and a direct confrontation where Chiwenga reportedly warned Mnangagwa against clinging to power in the manner of former President Robert Mugabe.

Sources say Chiwenga’s warning came with a clear message: any attempt to extend his rule would meet a similar fate to Mugabe’s forced exit.

Subsequently, Zanu PF’s Secretary for Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, publicly stated that Mnangagwa has no intention of pursuing a mandate beyond 2028.

“His Excellency had a role in drafting the current Constitution,” Chinamasa relayed, marking a stark shift that surprised many Mnangagwa supporters who, until Friday, had openly endorsed the 2030 Agenda at Zanu PF’s National People’s Conference in Bulawayo.

Support from powerful provincial leaders, such as Harare’s Godwills Masimirembwa, had solidified Mnangagwa’s push, with calls for constitutional amendments to grant either a third term or indefinite tenure.

These endorsements sidelined succession talks, further escalating tensions with Chiwenga’s camp.

Despite Mnangagwa’s calls for “unity and discipline” at the conference, his remarks appeared to reflect deepening concerns over internal factionalism.

His call to safeguard Zanu PF’s “supreme Party Constitution” was seen as a veiled rebuke to those questioning his authority.

Meanwhile, allies of Chiwenga—already frustrated by Mnangagwa’s extended ambitions—have reportedly intensified discussions around potential countermeasures, evoking memories of Chiwenga’s role in Mugabe’s ouster in 2017.

Analysts say the conference served as a “rubber-stamp” for Mnangagwa’s 2030 plan, sidelining the succession debate and leaving Zimbabwe’s political future in precarious balance.

With factional whispers of potential action growing, the question remains whether Chiwenga will once again leverage his military influence to counter Mnangagwa’s bid to extend his rule.

By Political Reporter—President Emmerson Mnangagwa appears to have shelved his ambitious 2030 Agenda, declaring he will not seek an extension of his term beyond 2028 amid intensifying pressure and veiled coup threats from his deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga.

The announcement of Mnangagwa’s apparent change of plans was delivered by Zanu PF’s Secretary for Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, on Saturday afternoon.

“His Excellency said he had a hand in crafting the current Constitution … I met him three times, and he said he has no wish to extend his mandate beyond 2028,” Chinamasa relayed, signalling a shift that surprised some of Mnangagwa’s allies who had championed his 2030 ambitions.

Friday, all Zanu PF provinces endorsed Mnangagwa’s 2030 Agenda at the party’s 21st National People’s Conference in Bulawayo, a development that heightened tensions in the power struggle between Mnangagwa and Chiwenga.

By backing an extended rule, provincial leaders, including those from Harare and the Midlands, openly supported potential constitutional amendments to grant Mnangagwa either a third term or an indefinite tenure.

Party unity chants for “2030 for Mnangagwa” echoed across Mashonaland and Matabeleland, sidelining succession discussions that insiders expected to dominate the conference.

Leading the charge for Mnangagwa was Harare Province Chairman Goodwills Masimirembwa, who proclaimed loyalty to the president while calling for a constitutional pathway to extend his leadership.

This unanimous provincial endorsement effectively curtailed discussions around succession—a topic growing more politically sensitive as Mnangagwa’s relationship with Chiwenga becomes strained.

While Mnangagwa spoke at the conference about unity and discipline, his words reflected underlying concerns about factionalism within Zanu PF ranks, hinting at anxiety over Chiwenga’s ambitions.

“Zanu PF is a moving train, always ready to welcome new members,” Mnangagwa declared. “However, party systems must be tightened against infiltration by divisive elements and malcontents who have no regard for the political order that is guaranteed by the supreme Party Constitution.”

Although Mnangagwa avoided direct mention of the “2030 Agenda,” his remarks emphasized loyalty to party principles, citing Zanu PF’s constitution to underscore the importance of allegiance in the face of potential threats.

Meanwhile, Chiwenga’s allies, viewing Mnangagwa’s 2030 push as an indefinite delay to Chiwenga’s own political rise, have grown increasingly frustrated. Some party insiders report mounting whispers of potential action from Chiwenga’s camp.

Having played a pivotal role in ousting former President Robert Mugabe in 2017, Chiwenga is rumoured to be considering another intervention if Mnangagwa’s ambitions further sideline him, potentially mirroring the tactics used to end Mugabe’s rule.

Political analysts argue that the Bulawayo conference served as a “rubber-stamp” event for Mnangagwa’s 2030 Agenda, providing no real forum for open debate on succession. Mnangagwa’s repeated insistence on “discipline” has been interpreted as a tactical reminder of loyalty amidst rising internal dissent.

By rallying support behind the 2030 goal, Mnangagwa may be signalling intentions to pursue constitutional amendments enabling his indefinite rule—a move likely to inflame tensions with Chiwenga’s camp.

During his address, Mnangagwa also praised Zanu PF’s recent election victories and highlighted the party’s new membership database—a tool for strengthening internal control and responsive planning.

Yet he criticized some districts for “chaotic records,” hinting at factional manipulation of party data for political gain.

This critique, subtle yet pointed, underscores Mnangagwa’s awareness of power struggles festering within Zanu PF.

The conflict between Mnangagwa’s 2030 ambitions and Chiwenga’s camp now looms over Zimbabwe’s political future.

The question remains whether Chiwenga, who has so far maintained a strategic silence, will eventually wield his military influence to counter Mnangagwa’s extended tenure plans.

By Political Reporter—President Emmerson Mnangagwa has won his bid to rule beyond 2028 after all Zanu provinces endorsed his 2030 agenda at Zanu PF’s 21st National People’s Conference in Bulawayo, raising the stakes in the simmering power struggle between Mnangagwa and his ambitious deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga.

With calls for Mnangagwa to extend his rule beyond the constitutional two-term limit, the conference has spotlighted the growing factional tension and heightened fears of an internal showdown, with speculation mounting about the possibility of a coup attempt.

Mnangagwa’s bid to cement power until 2030 has intensified concerns within Zanu PF.

As delegates chanted “2030 for Mnangagwa,” provincial leaders, including those from Harare and the Midlands, openly supported constitutional amendments that would grant Mnangagwa either a third term or an indefinite extension.

The chorus of support—from Mashonaland to Matabeleland—emphasized the party’s unity behind Mnangagwa’s leadership, effectively sidelining succession discussions that some insiders expected would take center stage.

Harare Province Chairman Godwills Masimirembwa led the charge, proclaiming loyalty to Mnangagwa and echoing calls from other provinces to extend his leadership.

The endorsement left little room for dialogue on leadership transition, a topic politically sensitive as Mnangagwa’s relationship with Chiwenga becomes increasingly strained.

Although Mnangagwa’s speech at the conference focused on unity and discipline, his language hinted at a growing unease over factionalism within Zanu PF ranks.

“Zanu PF is a moving train, always ready to welcome new members,” Mnangagwa said. “However, party systems must be tightened against infiltration by divisive elements and malcontents who have no regard for the political order that is guaranteed by the supreme Party Constitution.”

Mnangagwa avoided direct reference to the “2030 Agenda” endorsement but underscored loyalty to party principles.

Citing Article 3, Section 19 of Zanu PF’s constitution, he reminded delegates of their duty to the party and its leadership, condemning “ideological indecisiveness” and warning against “opportunists” who might undermine the party’s unity.

Meanwhile, Chiwenga’s allies—concerned that the 2030 push may sideline him indefinitely—have reportedly grown increasingly frustrated, with whispers of potential action mounting.

Chiwenga, a former military general instrumental in bringing Mnangagwa to power in 2017, is seen by some as a likely challenger.

Speculation has surged that he might orchestrate another military-backed intervention if Mnangagwa’s ambitions push him further to the margins, echoing the tactics that ended Robert Mugabe’s decades-long rule.

Political analysts have dubbed the conference a “rubber-stamp” event, suggesting that it offered little opportunity for open debate about the party’s future or succession.

Mnangagwa’s repeated insistence on “discipline” within Zanu PF has been interpreted as a strategic move to reinforce loyalty in the face of internal dissent.

By positioning the 2030 agenda as a priority, Mnangagwa may be preparing for further constitutional changes that allow him to extend his term indefinitely.

The president also seized the opportunity to commend Zanu PF’s recent election successes, underscoring the importance of the party’s multi-functional membership database—a tool that will streamline party structures and enable more responsive development planning.

Yet, Mnangagwa also criticized reports of “chaotic records” in certain districts, implying that some party officials are using disorganized databases to manipulate internal power dynamics.

Mnangagwa’s 2030 ambitions could place him on a collision course with Chiwenga, as the vice president’s faction evaluates its options in the escalating battle for Zanu PF’s future.

The question looming over Zimbabwe’s political landscape is whether Chiwenga, who has publicly remained silent, might eventually leverage his military influence to counter Mnangagwa’s efforts to cement his power indefinitely.

The outcome of this power struggle could reshape Zimbabwe’s political trajectory, with the spectre of another coup hanging in the balance as the ruling party’s leadership fractures.

By Political Reporter—All Zanu provinces have endorsed President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s “2030 Agenda” at Zanu PF’s 21st National People’s Conference in Bulawayo, raising the stakes in the simmering power struggle between Mnangagwa and his ambitious deputy, Vice President Constantino Chiwenga.

With calls for Mnangagwa to extend his rule beyond the constitutional two-term limit, the conference has spotlighted the growing factional tension and heightened fears of an internal showdown, with speculation mounting about the possibility of a coup attempt.

Mnangagwa’s bid to cement power until 2030 has intensified concerns within Zanu PF.

As delegates chanted “2030 for Mnangagwa,” provincial leaders, including those from Harare and the Midlands, openly supported constitutional amendments that would grant Mnangagwa either a third term or an indefinite extension.

The chorus of support—from Mashonaland to Matabeleland—emphasized the party’s unity behind Mnangagwa’s leadership, effectively sidelining succession discussions that some insiders expected would take center stage.

Harare Province Chairman Godwills Masimirembwa led the charge, proclaiming loyalty to Mnangagwa and echoing calls from other provinces to extend his leadership.

The endorsement left little room for dialogue on leadership transition, a topic politically sensitive as Mnangagwa’s relationship with Chiwenga becomes increasingly strained.

Although Mnangagwa’s speech at the conference focused on unity and discipline, his language hinted at a growing unease over factionalism within Zanu PF ranks.

“Zanu PF is a moving train, always ready to welcome new members,” Mnangagwa said. “However, party systems must be tightened against infiltration by divisive elements and malcontents who have no regard for the political order that is guaranteed by the supreme Party Constitution.”

Mnangagwa avoided direct reference to the “2030 Agenda” endorsement but underscored loyalty to party principles. Citing Article 3, Section 19 of Zanu PF’s constitution, he reminded delegates of their duty to the party and its leadership, condemning “ideological indecisiveness” and warning against “opportunists” who might undermine the party’s unity.

Meanwhile, Chiwenga’s allies—concerned that the 2030 push may sideline him indefinitely—have reportedly grown increasingly frustrated, with whispers of potential action mounting.

Chiwenga, a former military general instrumental in bringing Mnangagwa to power in 2017, is seen by some as a likely challenger.

Speculation has surged that he might orchestrate another military-backed intervention if Mnangagwa’s ambitions push him further to the margins, echoing the tactics that ended Robert Mugabe’s decades-long rule.

Political analysts have dubbed the conference a “rubber-stamp” event, suggesting that it offered little opportunity for open debate about the party’s future or succession.

Mnangagwa’s repeated insistence on “discipline” within Zanu PF has been interpreted as a strategic move to reinforce loyalty in the face of internal dissent.

By positioning the 2030 agenda as a priority, Mnangagwa may be preparing for further constitutional changes that allow him to extend his term indefinitely.

The president also seized the opportunity to commend Zanu PF’s recent election successes, underscoring the importance of the party’s multi-functional membership database—a tool that will streamline party structures and enable more responsive development planning.

Yet, Mnangagwa also criticized reports of “chaotic records” in certain districts, implying that some party officials are using disorganized databases to manipulate internal power dynamics.

In the escalating battle for Zanu PF’s future, Mnangagwa’s 2030 ambitions could place him on a collision course with Chiwenga, as the vice president’s faction evaluates its options.

The question looming over Zimbabwe’s political landscape is whether Chiwenga, who has publicly remained silent, might eventually leverage his military influence to counter Mnangagwa’s efforts to cement his power indefinitely.

The outcome of this power struggle could reshape Zimbabwe’s political trajectory, with the spectre of another coup hanging in the balance as the ruling party’s leadership fractures.

By Political Reporter — Vice President Constantino Chiwenga has warned President Emmerson Mnangagwa to rein in supporters attacking him, hinting that failure to do so could lead to another crisis akin to the 2017 coup that ousted President Mugabe.

This warning reportedly surfaced during a tense ZANU PF Central Committee meeting this week.

According to sources, Chiwenga expressed frustration over growing indiscipline within the party, which he said was fueling divisions.

An unnamed committee member shared, “Chiwenga emphasized unity and cautioned, ‘We don’t want to go back to 2017,’ leaving his words open to interpretation.”

President Mnangagwa, however, remained silent on the 2030 extension, reiterating the need for unity and discipline to achieve the party’s Vision 2030. Interestingly, the “ED2030” slogan was notably absent at the meeting.

ZANU PF Chair Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri also issued a strong warning against factionalism, pledging to tackle it head-on starting with Harare.

“Heads will roll,” she vowed, determined to restore party discipline.
The escalating tensions follow recent clashes, including a rebuke of Chiwenga by two senior officials close to Mnangagwa.

Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi dismissed reports of divisions, attributing them to media exaggeration, while Information Minister Jenfan Muswere downplayed the rivalry as social media fabrications.

Meanwhile, Mnangagwa’s allies, such as Local Government Minister Daniel Garwe, continue to endorse his Vision 2030, calling it “divinely guided.” This stance has angered Chiwenga’s camp, who accuse Mnangagwa of reneging on a 2017 pact to eventually pass power to Chiwenga.

The intensifying factional struggle comes amid Zimbabwe’s worsening economic crisis, sparking fears that the infighting could destabilize ZANU PF and further alienate the public amidst rising inflation and unemployment.

4

By Political Reporter — Vice President Constantino Chiwenga has warned President Emmerson Mnangagwa to rein in supporters attacking him, hinting that failure to do so could lead to another crisis akin to the 2017 coup that ousted President Mugabe.

This warning reportedly surfaced during a tense ZANU PF Central Committee meeting this week.

According to sources, Chiwenga expressed frustration over growing indiscipline within the party, which he said was fueling divisions.

An unnamed committee member shared, “Chiwenga emphasized unity and cautioned, ‘We don’t want to go back to 2017,’ leaving his words open to interpretation.”

President Mnangagwa, however, remained silent on the 2030 extension, reiterating the need for unity and discipline to achieve the party’s Vision 2030. Interestingly, the “ED2030” slogan was notably absent at the meeting.

ZANU PF Chair Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri also issued a strong warning against factionalism, pledging to tackle it head-on starting with Harare.

“Heads will roll,” she vowed, determined to restore party discipline.
The escalating tensions follow recent clashes, including a rebuke of Chiwenga by two senior officials close to Mnangagwa.

Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi dismissed reports of divisions, attributing them to media exaggeration, while Information Minister Jenfan Muswere downplayed the rivalry as social media fabrications.

Meanwhile, Mnangagwa’s allies, such as Local Government Minister Daniel Garwe, continue to endorse his Vision 2030, calling it “divinely guided.” This stance has angered Chiwenga’s camp, who accuse Mnangagwa of reneging on a 2017 pact to eventually pass power to Chiwenga.

The intensifying factional struggle comes amid Zimbabwe’s worsening economic crisis, sparking fears that the infighting could destabilize ZANU PF and further alienate the public amidst rising inflation and unemployment.

South Africa-South Africa — South Africa’s Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber announced the deportation of 19,750 undocumented immigrants, a process that has cost the South African government nearly R52.8 million (around US$3 million).

Zimbabweans make up the majority of these deportees, with over 7,000 Zimbabweans sent back in the 2022/2023 period alone, highlighting the dire economic pressures driving thousands to leave Harare.

The deepening economic situation in Zimbabwe is pushing citizens to seek stability abroad, even as host countries like South Africa adopt stricter immigration policies.

Zimbabwe faces skyrocketing inflation, high unemployment, and deteriorating public services, forcing many to risk deportation for a chance at economic survival.

Despite these challenges, the South African government has tightened its stance, notably phasing out the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) which previously allowed many Zimbabweans to work and reside legally.

On Wednesday, Zimbabwean Justice, Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi addressed these developments in the Senate.

He confirmed ongoing talks with South African officials but acknowledged the limits of what Zimbabwe’s government can achieve. “South Africa has its own immigration laws. Our role as a government is to advocate for our people’s needs through bilateral relations, hoping to find ways to assist them,” Ziyambi said.

The ZEP program, initially introduced by South Africa in 2008, offered temporary reprieve to Zimbabweans who fled during a period of severe political and economic turmoil.

Around 178,000 Zimbabwean nationals who arrived in South Africa before 2009 qualified for permits, which allowed them to live and work in the country legally.

The permits, however, are temporary; the latest extension, granted in response to advocacy and the political complexities involved, expires in November 2025 and will not be renewed, rendering holders ineligible for permanent residency.

As Zimbabweans face deportation or the looming threat of returning to an economically crippled nation, both governments are negotiating a path forward.

Ziyambi highlighted the difficulty of securing guarantees for Zimbabwean nationals in South Africa, but he assured that Zimbabwe’s Foreign Affairs Ministry continues discussions with South Africa’s Department of International Relations to find a solution.

For many Zimbabweans, the deteriorating conditions at home and uncertain status abroad present harsh choices, fueling further displacement and migration as economic stability remains out of reach.

South Africa-South Africa — In a sweeping move, South Africa’s Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber announced the deportation of 19,750 undocumented immigrants, a process that has cost the South African government nearly R52.8 million (around US$3 million).

Zimbabweans make up the majority of these deportees, with over 7,000 Zimbabweans sent back in the 2022/2023 period alone, highlighting the dire economic pressures driving thousands to leave Harare.

The deepening economic situation in Zimbabwe is pushing citizens to seek stability abroad, even as host countries like South Africa adopt stricter immigration policies.

Zimbabwe faces skyrocketing inflation, high unemployment, and deteriorating public services, forcing many to risk deportation for a chance at economic survival.

Despite these challenges, the South African government has tightened its stance, notably phasing out the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) which previously allowed many Zimbabweans to work and reside legally.

On Wednesday, Zimbabwean Justice, Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi addressed these developments in the Senate.

He confirmed ongoing talks with South African officials but acknowledged the limits of what Zimbabwe’s government can achieve. “South Africa has its own immigration laws. Our role as a government is to advocate for our people’s needs through bilateral relations, hoping to find ways to assist them,” Ziyambi said.

The ZEP program, initially introduced by South Africa in 2008, offered temporary reprieve to Zimbabweans who fled during a period of severe political and economic turmoil.

Around 178,000 Zimbabwean nationals who arrived in South Africa before 2009 qualified for permits, which allowed them to live and work in the country legally.

The permits, however, are temporary; the latest extension, granted in response to advocacy and the political complexities involved, expires in November 2025 and will not be renewed, rendering holders ineligible for permanent residency.

As Zimbabweans face deportation or the looming threat of returning to an economically crippled nation, both governments are negotiating a path forward.

Ziyambi highlighted the difficulty of securing guarantees for Zimbabwean nationals in South Africa, but he assured that Zimbabwe’s Foreign Affairs Ministry continues discussions with South Africa’s Department of International Relations to find a solution.

For many Zimbabweans, the deteriorating conditions at home and uncertain status abroad present harsh choices, fueling further displacement and migration as economic stability remains out of reach.

By Political Reporter — Tensions have reached a boiling point after President Emmerson Mnangagwa and Vice President Constantino Chiwenga’s supporters locked horns over the post-2028 party succession issue whose agenda could be smuggled into the party’s annual conference, underway in Bulawayo.

This comes after two senior party officials who are Mnangagwa’s top allies openly rebuked Chiwenga, making it clear there was “no vacancy” in the highest office of the land.

Among them, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, a close Mnangagwa ally, sought to dismiss the media’s focus on Mnangagwa and Chiwenga’s rivalry, accusing reporters of fabricating divisions.

“I hear this from you, the media. We actually sit down and laugh about what is being written. We’re aware of the stories that suggest fictitious divisions that do not exist,” Ziyambi said. He assured that party leaders would appear united, though this unity was questioned by party insiders and critics alike.

Echoing Ziyambi’s stance, Information Minister Jenfan Muswere also attempted to play down the rift on Thursday, claiming “unity, love, comradeship, and harmony” prevail in the Zanu PF Presidium.

Muswere dismissed any rumours of discord as “overzealous misdirected energies of half-wits on social media” trying to undermine the party’s unity.

However, Mnangagwa’s allies have recently stepped up their endorsements, with Local Government Minister Daniel Garwe publicly backing Mnangagwa’s continued rule. Garwe praised the President’s Vision 2030 agenda as “guided by God” and cautioned that any attempt to displace Mnangagwa would be futile.

“Leaders are chosen by God,” he stated, suggesting that Mnangagwa’s leadership was divinely sanctioned.

These statements have aggravated Chiwenga’s supporters, who accuse Mnangagwa of reneging on a 2017 pact to step aside for Chiwenga following the coup that ousted long-time leader Robert Mugabe.

The Vice President’s camp is now rallying to challenge Mnangagwa’s faction, claiming the President is blocking Chiwenga’s path to power as the 2028 election approaches.

Mnangagwa is reportedly mobilizing his own faction to secure his hold over the party and prevent Chiwenga’s anticipated ascent.

This deepening power struggle has raised fears of destabilization within Zanu PF, further exacerbated by Zimbabwe’s severe economic challenges. Rising inflation, unemployment, and deteriorating living conditions are fueling public unrest, complicating Zanu PF’s internal conflict as it struggles to maintain control.

By Political Reporter — A senior adviser to Nelson Chamisa claims that the opposition leader secured as much as 80% of the presidential vote in Zimbabwe’s 2023 elections, alleging that the ruling party, Zanu PF, rigged the outcome to keep President Emmerson Mnangagwa in power.

Denford Ngadziore, who oversaw the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) polling agents, posted on X (formerly Twitter) that Chamisa would “wallop Mnangagwa in a free and fair election.”

This is not the first time Chamisa’s party has raised concerns about Zanu PF’s electoral practices.

In the 2018 elections, Chamisa accused Zanu PF and the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) of manipulating the vote count to grant Mnangagwa a victory, despite widespread reports of irregularities.

Protesters took to the streets, only to face a brutal crackdown by state security forces, leaving six dead and further deepening scepticism about the integrity of Zimbabwe’s electoral system.

Chamisa’s 2023 campaign intensified his call for transparent elections, with his party emphasizing the need for international observers, particularly after Zanu PF’s previous alleged tactics of manipulating vote counts, restricting CCC campaign activities, and intimidating voters.

The CCC pointed to numerous irregularities during the recent polls, such as denied accreditation for CCC polling agents, vote tampering, and reports of ballot box stuffing.

Observers, including the European Union, also noted these irregularities, questioning the legitimacy of the final results.

Zanu PF’s historical tactics in election rigging have been widely criticized.

Under former President Robert Mugabe, the party faced accusations of vote-buying, intimidation, and using state resources to favour party loyalists.

This trend has continued under Mnangagwa’s leadership, according to critics, with allegations of militarized campaigns, ghost voters on the electoral roll, and rural vote manipulation.

Chamisa has consistently claimed that, under these circumstances, achieving a fair election outcome has been an impossible challenge for opposition candidates.

Despite Ngadziore’s bold claims, Zanu PF has dismissed Chamisa’s accusations, labelling them as baseless and insisting the party operates fairly.

Yet, with both the 2018 and 2023 elections marred by accusations of rigging, Chamisa’s supporters argue that Zimbabwe’s hope for democratic reform continues to be stifled by an entrenched ruling party unwilling to relinquish power.