By Linda Masarira

You raise critical points about the dynamics of politics in Zimbabwe. While it’s undeniable that ZANU-PF’s track record includes suppression, destruction, and intimidation, it’s also true that politics cannot exist in a vacuum. To bring about change, engagement is sometimes necessary, not as endorsement, but as a means to challenge, influence, and advocate for the betterment of all Zimbabweans.

Here’s the reality, engagement is not collaboration. Opposition leaders, MPs, and councillors must participate in councils, parliament, and policy discussions because that’s where laws and budgets are crafted. Refusing to engage cedes ground to those who prioritize their own interests over the people’s.

Holding power accountable. Engagement creates opportunities to expose weaknesses in their policies, demand accountability, and push for reforms that reflect the people’s needs.

Unity in diversity is key in national developmental issues.

Even in oppressive systems, political forces with competing ideologies must find common ground on policies affecting national welfare. This doesn’t make one toothless; it makes one strategic.

You need to distinguish collaboration from compromise. Engaging ZANU-PF doesn’t mean agreeing with their oppressive governance.

It’s about pushing back through dialogue, advocacy, and parliamentary oversight while remaining steadfast to one’s principles.

True political strength lies in showing that you can stand firm in your beliefs while tactically engaging with those in power to force change.

Only through strategy and persistence can we dismantle the cult-like dominance of ZANU-PF and restore democracy.