By A Correspondent
Controversial Zanu PF official Killer Zivhu has sparked heated debate after claiming that elections are no longer necessary in Zimbabwe, advocating for the transition of the country from a republic to a kingdom under President Emmerson Mnangagwa.
Zivhu, known for his outspoken support of Mnangagwa, made his bold declaration on X (formerly Twitter) over the weekend. He wrote:
“Get ready for the return of Mutapa, The day of his resurgence is now marked on the calendar. Let us reform our constitution, transitioning from a republic to a kingdom. No more elections – instead, let Mutapa reign supreme, forever. ED is the rightful heir to Mutapa’s throne.”
His comments have ignited a fierce debate on social media, with many questioning whether such an idea is in the best interest of the country. Zivhu’s call for the total abolition of elections and the establishment of a monarchy under Mnangagwa has drawn widespread criticism, as critics argue that it undermines democratic principles.
By proposing a system where Mnangagwa would rule indefinitely, Zivhu’s comments seem to challenge Zimbabwe’s constitution, which establishes the country as a republic with regular elections. The proposal to “ditch elections” has raised concerns among those who value democratic processes and the right of citizens to choose their leaders.
Supporters of Zivhu’s view, however, argue that a more centralized form of governance could bring stability and long-term leadership to Zimbabwe, avoiding the disruptions often associated with frequent elections. But critics are quick to point out the risks of absolute power, with some warning of the potential for corruption and abuse of authority if power remains unchecked.
Political analysts have condemned the idea, emphasizing that any push to abolish elections would be detrimental to the nation’s progress. Zimbabwe has experienced significant political turmoil in the past, and many believe that the path to a prosperous future lies in strengthening democratic institutions, not dismantling them.
In light of Zivhu’s controversial statement, the question remains: Should Zimbabwe abandon elections and embrace an unchallenged, perpetual rule under Mnangagwa, or is it crucial to uphold the democratic values enshrined in the country’s constitution?
As the debate continues, one thing is clear – Zivhu’s remarks have reignited conversations about Zimbabwe’s political future and the importance of elections in ensuring a fair and accountable government.