The Coronavirus Nonsense was clearly caused by State Capture and China's economy is now going down after arresting the late Doctor, can any nation thus survive when it's captured by politicians Chiwenga-style @edmnangagwa @China_Amb_Zim ?
— ZimEye (@ZimEye) March 2, 2020
Last month, the South African government told ZANU PF leader, Emmerson Mnangagwa to his face, the country is now lawless and unsafe for investments.
This no holds barred statement was delivered by the South African ambassador, Mphakama Mbete who said Zimbabwe is now lawless on 10 fronts. He was speaking during last week’s Polad economic summit at the HICC where he said Zimbabwe:
- Has non working Public Institutions.
- is now totally lawless – no rule of law at all.
- Now has extractive political and economic institutions.
- Now run by rent-seekers and political manipulators.
- Has no security of tenure .
- Does not protect investments.
- Does not honour of bilateral trade and investment agreements.
- Does not service its debts.
- The will of the people is suppressed, and active citizenry low.
- Investments are not safe
VIDEO LOADING BELOW….
Ambassador Mphakama Mbete told the Political Actors Dialogue (Polad) economic summit last week,
“In terms of active citizenry would believe that this is a very important factor of a thriving democracy. Ultimately it is the will of the people that must prevail for any democracy to be sustained.”
He however began his speech outlining the following:
“A comment on Public Institutions. We believe that Public institutions are key to proper economic management and must be allowed to pursue their mandate in line with the policy framework and legislation that establishes them. These institutions are important to provide a stable and predictable economic environment for business to thrive,” Mbete said.
Business, particularly through Employers Confederation of Zimbabwe, has accused government of dragging the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe into quasi-fiscal activities and allowing it to print or generate money for political expediency and resultantly undermine the local currency.
Mbete said research showed that governments which manipulated institutions led generally poor nations.
“Nations with extractive political and economic institutions are likely to be poor compared to those with inclusive economic institutions, where the rule of law is protected against rent-seeking and political manipulation,” he said.
Mnangagwa’s government has been posturing, telling its African and international audiences that sanctions were affecting economic development in the country and hindering foreign direct investment (FDI), but Mbete sang from a different hymnbook.
“Zimbabwe has presented itself to be open for business, which we believe is an appropriate approach to developing this country and economy. However, in order to attract significant flows of direct investment, it is import that Zimbabwe improves its record concerning the following issues; security of tenure and investment protection; repatriation of proceeds by investors; the honouring of bilateral trade and investment agreements; the need to open up the economy to competition and establishment of new credibilities, lastly optimal debt servicing,” he said.
Zimbabwe has been writing laws to protect local industries from competition, especially by enforcing punitive import tariffs and closing out some sectors to foreign competition.
These include Statutory Instrument (SI) 64 of 2016, whose objective was to boost domestic production by protecting local industries from unfair competition from foreign firms.
The SI resulted in the removal of 43 products from the Open General Import Licence.
Zimbabwe, however, repealed SI 64, all its predecessors and consolidated their contents into SI 122 of 2017 with import controls, though relaxed, still haunting the nation.
The laws came under scrutiny after the country joined the African Continental Free Trade Area, which will remove economic borders and bring fierce continental competition.
Mbete told government that without addressing these issues, FDI would seek safer destinations.
“We believe that in a highly competitive environment for FDI, these are but a few of the basic conditions that must be upheld at all times. In our view, failure to do so means that investment capital will always look past Zimbabwe to other safer havens,” he said.
Touching on the core of economic decay, Mbete said the shortages of energy, fuel and water in Zimbabwe were not making matters any better.
“Zimbabwe has an industry base that has been neglected for long and needs reinvestment and re-calibrating. This neglect undermines government revenue collection potential since industry is operating below its potential. Industry and the economy by extension triumphs when basic services such as energy, fuel, water, bulk services, for example, are provided in a consistent and predictable way, this is essential for long-term planning by the productive sectors,” he said.
“We think it is important for all members of society to enter into a social contract wherein government, business, labour and citizens rally behind a common vision of the country of Zimbabwe.
Success requires mutual co-operation of all players as no one section of society can do it alone.”
Added Mbete: “South Africa, we believe, has had a very successful social contract through the National Economic Development Labour Council.”
Dr Admore Tshuma from Kent University was asked by SABC: What were you aiming to achieve?, and he answered as follows: “the study is a socio-economic perspective. The study explores how the future in South Africa may unfold if expropriation of land without compensation goes ahead. “The aim is not to take a side in this argument, but to unpack the perspective, of human rights and economic paradigms. This is the first time that such a question has been examined by social science using an objectively collected data. The main aim is not to diminish claims for redistribution of land, but to highlight the detriment of the expropriation of land without compensation. “In this study I am very mindful of the sensitivity of the issue of land and I am also aware that there is little consensus of what benefit expropriation of land will produce for South Africa. 
